Does the OKR approach to strategy deployment reflect the 'top-down' mentality of Big Tech? Does OKR reflect the debilitating phenomenon called ‘Software Brain’, and its core premise - Life is just a series of loops & databases…?
Strategy is a Messy Human Thing
As with many fallacies, ‘Software Brain’ contains a significant
element of truth. Life is indeed a ‘series of loops & databases’. Study
& understand these loops & databased and you acquire a superpower, which
used wisely can greatly reduce human suffering. But life is much more than this.
But if you try to flatten life in this way you may end up
becoming hated, no? Life also comprises messy, unpredictable, thorny, comical
things like human beings, their memories, emotions, ideas & intuitions; their
dreams, aspirations, religious beliefs and shared conscious & unconscious
minds; the cycles & rhythms of nature including human nature, animals &
the forces of physics, chemistry, biology, the pure ideas of philosophy and
mathematics.
Aristotle described the two Worlds of Necessity and
Contingency. Software brain seeks to flatten the world to match algorithms,
loops and databases, which is a paltry & incomplete reflection of one of Aristotle’s
worlds. Does OKR do the same?
The Essence of Strategy Deployment
& Execution
Strategy deployment entails engaging the genius of the
organization. The Leader’s most
important job is developing a questioning culture, one in which healthy push-back
is encouraged. “Here’s our Aspiration
& Winning Logic. What do you think? Help
us understand what we’re missing; give us fresh perspectives and your ideas on
how to get better.”
To be sure, I’ve encountered OKR companies with questioning
cultures wherein healthy dissent in encouraged, but they’re a minority. More common is the superficial, unimaginative
Aspiration & Winning Logic, mechanically pushed down with little reflection,
testing or validation. People tune out – (‘Here’s one more dumb thing I have to
do…’). Do they sense that their humanity is being flattened into loops and
databases?
The W-V model attributed
to the great Shoji Shiba is a fine example of a healthy Strategy Deployment
system. Hypotheses continually bounce back and forth between management levels. “Here’s what we think? Are we on the right
track? If so, please translate our shared thinking into tactics for your team,
department or site.”
Most importantly, this
back & forth between and among management levels continues into &
throughout the strategy execution cycle.
Key Attributes of World Class Strategy Systems
When I’m asked by a
Board or Senior Team to ‘assess our strategy & management system’, a key
step is to walk the value stream backwards, starting with the customer, and
moving upstream one step at a time till you get to raw material suppliers. A
parallel step entails walking the customer journey backstream, starting with
the top of the proverbial funnel.
In my value stream
walks, I ask questions like:
·
Are problems visible (even to an outsider
like me)?
·
What do people talk about in their
huddles (from senior leaders to the front-line)?
·
What’s the organization’s attitude to
problems? Are problems hidden, a sign of failure? Or are they, to quote W.
Edwards Deming, ‘the process speaking to us’?
·
Do teams have a standard approach to
problem solving?
·
How good is the data? Is it complete, end
to end, and of high quality?
·
Does the team develop ‘Your Own Data’
(YODA) as required? Or do they passively wait for corporate data?
These are all messy
questions that engage both hemispheres of the brain and both of Aristotle’s
worlds. Does your OKR process foster a healthy, pushback culture that can sustain
& engage? Or does it flatten corporate life?
Best wishes,
Pascal Dennis E: pascal.dennis@leansystems.org