Who are we, and what do we believe in? Where are we going, and how will we get there? Such are the core questions of Purpose. How well we answer such questions – as people & organizations – determines clarity of Purpose – or lack thereof. So how do we answer them?
To define your
Purpose is to look up toward a better future. Doing so is uplifting
in that it pulls you out of your current quagmire and forces you to consider
the entire chessboard, design space, or gestalt, if you will. Everything
is connected and if you look closely enough, individual parts form meaningful
patterns, which often are the key to strategy.
Who are we and what do we believe in?
Answering such
questions requires an intuitive understanding of your history, formative
experiences, victories & defeats, and their why & wherefore. A useful
subordinate question is: Where do we come from? This is difficult for
young companies and especially so for startups, which explains why such
organizations often have dreadful, abusive cultures. Often the leaders of such
companies cannot imagine anything different because there are no signs, no
precedents. There is no Dave Hewlett or Bill Packard, no Charles Kimberly or
John Clark history to guide them. And no sages to whisper, ‘What would Dave
& Bill have done?’
I’ve been lucky
enough to work for some years with a fine international Insurance & Wealth
Management firm that has a deep connection to its 150-year history – a history
of achievement, stability, and community service. The corridors leading the
Board room display foundational images, and the portraits of senior leaders
beginning with the founder. The message is unmistakable – This is where we come
from, who we are and what we believe in. Needless to say, helping answer
such questions is an essential element of my practice.
Where are we going and how do we get there?
The Stick Model of Value is a useful framework for telling your story.
Will we win by creating more Value & thereby increasing the customer’s
Willing to Pay? Or by continuously reducing our cost by engaging all team
members in waste reduction, so that we sell more? Or permutations thereof?
A high-end recreational vehicle supplier I know has defined their
winning logic as follows: ‘Speed – Cost – Innovation: 1) We’ll be faster at
design & deployment than our low-cost offshore competitors by…, 2) We’ll
reduce of cost of labor through Lean/OpEx methods to less than 20% of total
cost so that it’s irrelevant, and 3) We’ll have the best Tech & innovation
in our industry by…’
Result? On familiarizing himself with the books, the new CFO said to me,
“This place is a cash machine.’ The
company also has a rich sense of where they come from & a history of
decency & fair play. As a result, people stay, get better & better at
their work, and contribute. Win-win.
Last thing, can you
outsource all this to AI?
Best wishes,
Pascal Dennis E: pascal.dennis@leansystems.org
No comments:
Post a Comment