By Pascal Dennis (bio)
Building on a blog from earlier this year, the strategy is not about perfection. In fact, there is no right strategy.
This is often difficult for senior leaders to accept because it runs contrary to their experience.
Senior leaders are usually the smartest kids in the class, the ones who always have the right answer.
They naturally enjoy the glow of being ‘right’ (synonymous with being ‘smart’). This pattern deepens as they embark on their chosen professions.
Again, they are the smartest people in the room, the ones with the answers, who confidently define what we need to do next.
Such confidence is an important element of leadership. Indeed, good leaders exude a feeling of ‘we will succeed beyond any possibility of doubt.’
Such confidence allows people to relax and get on with the job.
And so, most senior leaders have been conditioned to want to be ‘right’. But, as I said, there is no right strategy.
The past is not the future, and no amount of analysis and reflection will predict the myriad permutations the business chessboard will express.
Some people conclude therefore, that there is no point to developing strategy, that it’s best to ‘just react’ to what happens.
[For strategy geeks, in my opinion, doing so entails misunderstanding the great Henry Mintzberg’s ‘emergent strategy’ concept.]
Yes, it’s true that nowadays it seems there are ‘Black Swans’ everywhere. So why bother with strategy at all?
Twas ever thus – and forever will be. You want to see Black Swans? Check out Ken Burns splendid Vietnam documentary – the episodes that focus on 1968.
There is no right strategy – but there is a right process. By reflecting deeply on what’s happened, on where we want to go, and on what’s preventing us, we better understand the chessboard, the terrain, the pieces, competitors, and our capabilities.
If our strategic planning and deployment process is simple, waste- and hassle-free, we begin the understand the important gaps in technology, customer experience, culture, capability and management systems.
And we take action, we strengthen our weak points, we plug the gaps, we prepare.
In effect, we are projecting our nervous system in to the future, so that when and if the Black Swan appears, we’re not paralyzed. We’re alert, focused and confident. “Folks, this isn’t anything that hasn’t happened before…”
Sound strategic planning, therefore, builds fortitude and tenacity. This is most obvious in sports, where Black Swans are not uncommon. Nobody can predict which way the ball will bounce, or what the score is after the first ten minutes.
But is you have a clear plan and a good understanding of the terrain, competition, your capabilities and have worked on your gaps, you’re much more likely to recover from whatever fate throws your way.
Our articulated Purpose and strategy, therefore, should be clear and simple, as should our strategic planning process.
Nimbleness is of the essence. We should be able to quickly align and deploy, and just as quickly realign and redeploy.
Modular plans, visual management, stand-up meetings, brevity, a shared simple problem solving method are important elements of agility. (How does all this fit together? My books are essentially movies about it, pardon the plug.)
Corporate planning in many large organizations is, sadly, the opposite of nimble. The following adjectives come to mind: ponderous, heavy, boring, wasteful, difficult, confusing…
By adhering to a heavy, formal annual planning process, we are, in effect, projecting our punches. A droll competitor might wait till we publish our strategy, and then the day after, change theirs…
There is no right answer in strategy, but there is a right process.
Best wishes,
Pascal
In case you missed our last few blogs... please feel free to have another look…
Content Follows Form or Acting Your Way to New Thinking
Value & Waste at the Imperial Grill
Value in an Age of Endless Innovation
The Power of One Page
Showing posts with label Henry Mintzberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Henry Mintzberg. Show all posts
Monday, April 29, 2024
There is No Right Answer in Strategy
Labels:
Henry Mintzberg,
Ken Burns,
planning,
Strategy
Monday, February 19, 2024
Strategy in a Time of Explosive Change
By Pascal Dennis (bio)
May you live in interesting times – Chinese Curse
Interesting times indeed, no? The reasons are too long to recite here – changing technology, customer expectations, internationalization, rapid cultural shifts, the explosion of information…
Technological change, for example, is so rapid and severe that in many industries we can no longer confidently define value.
The ‘Eight Essential’ technologies – Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, AI, Blockchain, Robotics, Drones, Internet of Things, and 3-D Printing have exploded the ‘design space’.
Only by developing deep empathy with our customers & their customer journeys can we begin to understand what’s important to them. And even then, value is a moving target.
So it goes…
How to manage one’s business (and one’s life) in such times?
Let’s focus on the most important things first: How do we develop and deploy strategy in ‘interesting’ times?
Quick & ‘Easy’ Strategy
Keep it simple – if you can’t tell the story with one-page, do you understand it?
Accept that when it comes to strategy, perfection is impossible - and not even desirable! Remember, there is no right answer in strategy – only a right process!
Ensure, therefore, that purpose & logic are clear so that when you inevitably ‘pivot’, you’ll know what parts of your hypothesis were sound or not, and why.
Choose!
Strategy is not about deciding what’s important. All the ideas your team proposes are likely ‘important’. But you can’t do them all – you have to choose.
Too often, leaders try to hedge their bets by choosing too much, with predictable results. Choose the critical few, check frequently, and be prepared to pivot.
Please don’t misunderstand the great Henry Mintzberg’s ‘emergent’ strategies concept. Just because you’re prepared to pivot, doesn’t mean you needn’t articulate a hypothesis!
Failing to do so, of course, condemns you to the limbo of endless reaction & limited learning.
Avoid Boring Strategy Docs
The typical corporate strategy comprises a ‘Mission’, ‘Initiatives’, and in effect, a ‘Budget with Prose’. (Tip of the hat to another great, Dr. Roger Martin, for this.)
These are deadly dull and have a soporific effect on your team. ZZZZZZZZZZZZ…..
Keep your strategy to one page, tell your story, and answer the Big Questions as simply and clearly as you can:
These are difficult questions, of course, which require deep experience and reflection. To develop a good strategy we need to bounce between the worlds of action and thought.
As the saying goes, get out of the building.
And finally, even though we live in times of explosive change, remember that some things are eternal.
Reflection, experience and the intuition gained thereby are innately human, and unlikely to be replaced by technology.
More likely, in my view, technology will enable the strategist, just as a horse enables the rider.
But that’s the topic of another blog.
Here’s to interesting strategic journeys.
Best regards,
Pascal
In case you missed our last few blogs... please feel free to have another look…
The Function of Leaders is to Produce More Leaders
Complexity is a Crude State, Simplicity Marks the End of a Process of Refinement
Can Lean & Agile Help to Fix Our Courts? Part 4
Can Lean & Agile Help to Fix Our Courts? Part 3
May you live in interesting times – Chinese Curse
Interesting times indeed, no? The reasons are too long to recite here – changing technology, customer expectations, internationalization, rapid cultural shifts, the explosion of information…
Technological change, for example, is so rapid and severe that in many industries we can no longer confidently define value.
The ‘Eight Essential’ technologies – Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, AI, Blockchain, Robotics, Drones, Internet of Things, and 3-D Printing have exploded the ‘design space’.
Only by developing deep empathy with our customers & their customer journeys can we begin to understand what’s important to them. And even then, value is a moving target.
So it goes…
How to manage one’s business (and one’s life) in such times?
Let’s focus on the most important things first: How do we develop and deploy strategy in ‘interesting’ times?
Quick & ‘Easy’ Strategy
Keep it simple – if you can’t tell the story with one-page, do you understand it?
Accept that when it comes to strategy, perfection is impossible - and not even desirable! Remember, there is no right answer in strategy – only a right process!
Ensure, therefore, that purpose & logic are clear so that when you inevitably ‘pivot’, you’ll know what parts of your hypothesis were sound or not, and why.
Choose!
Strategy is not about deciding what’s important. All the ideas your team proposes are likely ‘important’. But you can’t do them all – you have to choose.
Too often, leaders try to hedge their bets by choosing too much, with predictable results. Choose the critical few, check frequently, and be prepared to pivot.
Please don’t misunderstand the great Henry Mintzberg’s ‘emergent’ strategies concept. Just because you’re prepared to pivot, doesn’t mean you needn’t articulate a hypothesis!
Failing to do so, of course, condemns you to the limbo of endless reaction & limited learning.
Avoid Boring Strategy Docs
The typical corporate strategy comprises a ‘Mission’, ‘Initiatives’, and in effect, a ‘Budget with Prose’. (Tip of the hat to another great, Dr. Roger Martin, for this.)
These are deadly dull and have a soporific effect on your team. ZZZZZZZZZZZZ…..
Keep your strategy to one page, tell your story, and answer the Big Questions as simply and clearly as you can:
- Who are we and what do we believe in?
- Where are we going?
- How do we get there? (What’s our underlying logic?)
- What’s preventing us?
- What capabilities do we need to develop?
- What management systems do we need to develop?
These are difficult questions, of course, which require deep experience and reflection. To develop a good strategy we need to bounce between the worlds of action and thought.
As the saying goes, get out of the building.
And finally, even though we live in times of explosive change, remember that some things are eternal.
Reflection, experience and the intuition gained thereby are innately human, and unlikely to be replaced by technology.
More likely, in my view, technology will enable the strategist, just as a horse enables the rider.
But that’s the topic of another blog.
Here’s to interesting strategic journeys.
Best regards,
Pascal
In case you missed our last few blogs... please feel free to have another look…
The Function of Leaders is to Produce More Leaders
Complexity is a Crude State, Simplicity Marks the End of a Process of Refinement
Can Lean & Agile Help to Fix Our Courts? Part 4
Can Lean & Agile Help to Fix Our Courts? Part 3
Monday, October 15, 2018
Strategy in a Time of Explosive Change
By Pascal Dennis (bio)
May you live in interesting times – Chinese Curse
Interesting times indeed, no? The reasons are too long to recite here – changing technology, customer expectations, internationalization, rapid cultural shifts, the explosion of information…
Technological change, for example, is so rapid and severe that in many industries we can no longer confidently define value.
The ‘Eight Essential’ technologies – Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, AI, Blockchain, Robotics, Drones, Internet of Things, and 3-D Printing have exploded the ‘design space’.
Only by developing deep empathy with our customers & their customer journeys can we begin to understand what’s important to them. And even then, value is a moving target.
So it goes…
How to manage one’s business (and one’s life) in such times?
Let’s focus on the most important things first: How do we develop and deploy strategy in ‘interesting’ times?
Quick & ‘Easy’ Strategy
Keep it simple – if you can’t tell the story with one-page, do you understand it?
Accept that when it comes to strategy, perfection is impossible - and not even desirable! Remember, there is no right answer in strategy – only a right process!
Ensure, therefore, that purpose & logic are clear so that when you inevitably ‘pivot’, you’ll know what parts of your hypothesis were sound or not, and why.
Choose!
Strategy is not about deciding what’s important. All the ideas your team proposes are likely ‘important’. But you can’t do them all – you have to choose.
Too often, leaders try to hedge their bets by choosing too much, with predictable results. Choose the critical few, check frequently, and be prepared to pivot.
Please don’t misunderstand the great Henry Mintzberg’s ‘emergent’ strategies concept. Just because you’re prepared to pivot, doesn’t mean you needn’t articulate a hypothesis!
Failing to do so, of course, condemns you to the limbo of endless reaction & limited learning.
Avoid Boring Strategy Docs
The typical corporate strategy comprises a ‘Mission’, ‘Initiatives’, and in effect, a ‘Budget with Prose’. (Tip of the hat to another great, Dr. Roger Martin, for this.)
These are deadly dull and have a soporific effect on your team. ZZZZZZZZZZZZ…..
Keep your strategy to one page, tell your story, and answer the Big Questions as simply and clearly as you can:
These are difficult questions, of course, which require deep experience and reflection. To develop a good strategy we need to bounce between the worlds of action and thought.
As the saying goes, get out of the building.
And finally, even though we live in times of explosive change, remember that some things are eternal.
Reflection, experience and the intuition gained thereby are innately human, and unlikely to be replaced by technology.
More likely, in my view, technology will enable the strategist, just as a horse enables the rider.
But that’s the topic of another blog.
Here’s to interesting strategic journeys.
Best regards,
Pascal
May you live in interesting times – Chinese Curse
Interesting times indeed, no? The reasons are too long to recite here – changing technology, customer expectations, internationalization, rapid cultural shifts, the explosion of information…
Technological change, for example, is so rapid and severe that in many industries we can no longer confidently define value.
The ‘Eight Essential’ technologies – Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, AI, Blockchain, Robotics, Drones, Internet of Things, and 3-D Printing have exploded the ‘design space’.
Only by developing deep empathy with our customers & their customer journeys can we begin to understand what’s important to them. And even then, value is a moving target.
So it goes…
How to manage one’s business (and one’s life) in such times?
Let’s focus on the most important things first: How do we develop and deploy strategy in ‘interesting’ times?
Quick & ‘Easy’ Strategy
Keep it simple – if you can’t tell the story with one-page, do you understand it?
Accept that when it comes to strategy, perfection is impossible - and not even desirable! Remember, there is no right answer in strategy – only a right process!
Ensure, therefore, that purpose & logic are clear so that when you inevitably ‘pivot’, you’ll know what parts of your hypothesis were sound or not, and why.
Choose!
Strategy is not about deciding what’s important. All the ideas your team proposes are likely ‘important’. But you can’t do them all – you have to choose.
Too often, leaders try to hedge their bets by choosing too much, with predictable results. Choose the critical few, check frequently, and be prepared to pivot.
Please don’t misunderstand the great Henry Mintzberg’s ‘emergent’ strategies concept. Just because you’re prepared to pivot, doesn’t mean you needn’t articulate a hypothesis!
Failing to do so, of course, condemns you to the limbo of endless reaction & limited learning.
Avoid Boring Strategy Docs
The typical corporate strategy comprises a ‘Mission’, ‘Initiatives’, and in effect, a ‘Budget with Prose’. (Tip of the hat to another great, Dr. Roger Martin, for this.)
These are deadly dull and have a soporific effect on your team. ZZZZZZZZZZZZ…..
Keep your strategy to one page, tell your story, and answer the Big Questions as simply and clearly as you can:
- Who are we and what do we believe in?
- Where are we going?
- How do we get there? (What’s our underlying logic?)
- What’s preventing us?
- What capabilities do we need to develop?
- What management systems do we need to develop?
These are difficult questions, of course, which require deep experience and reflection. To develop a good strategy we need to bounce between the worlds of action and thought.
As the saying goes, get out of the building.
And finally, even though we live in times of explosive change, remember that some things are eternal.
Reflection, experience and the intuition gained thereby are innately human, and unlikely to be replaced by technology.
More likely, in my view, technology will enable the strategist, just as a horse enables the rider.
But that’s the topic of another blog.
Here’s to interesting strategic journeys.
Best regards,
Pascal
Monday, September 3, 2018
There is No Right Answer in Strategy
By Pascal Dennis (bio)
Building on my last blog, the strategy is not about perfection. In fact, there is no right strategy.
This is often difficult for senior leaders to accept because it runs contrary to their experience.
Senior leaders are usually the smartest kids in the class, the ones who always have the right answer.
They naturally enjoy the glow of being ‘right’ (synonymous with being ‘smart’). This pattern deepens as they embark on their chosen professions.
Again, they are the smartest people in the room, the ones with the answers, who confidently define what we need to do next.
Such confidence is an important element of leadership. Indeed, good leaders exude a feeling of ‘we will succeed beyond any possibility of doubt.’
Such confidence allows people to relax and get on with the job.
And so, most senior leaders have been conditioned to want to be ‘right’. But, as I said, there is no right strategy.
The past is not the future, and no amount of analysis and reflection will predict the myriad permutations the business chessboard will express.
Some people conclude therefore, that there is no point to developing strategy, that it’s best to ‘just react’ to what happens.
[For strategy geeks, in my opinion, doing so entails misunderstanding the great Henry Mintzberg’s ‘emergent strategy’ concept.]
Yes, it’s true that nowadays it seems there are ‘Black Swans’ everywhere. So why bother with strategy at all?
Twas ever thus – and forever will be. You want to see Black Swans? Check out Ken Burns splendid Vietnam documentary – the episodes that focus on 1968.
There is no right strategy – but there is a right process. By reflecting deeply on what’s happened, on where we want to go, and on what’s preventing us, we better understand the chessboard, the terrain, the pieces, competitors, and our capabilities.
If our strategic planning and deployment process is simple, waste- and hassle-free, we begin the understand the important gaps in technology, customer experience, culture, capability and management systems.
And we take action, we strengthen our weak points, we plug the gaps, we prepare.
In effect, we are projecting our nervous system in to the future, so that when and if the Black Swan appears, we’re not paralyzed. We’re alert, focused and confident. “Folks, this isn’t anything that hasn’t happened before…”
Sound strategic planning, therefore, builds fortitude and tenacity. This is most obvious in sports, where Black Swans are not uncommon. Nobody can predict which way the ball will bounce, or what the score is after the first ten minutes.
But is you have a clear plan and a good understanding of the terrain, competition, your capabilities and have worked on your gaps, you’re much more likely to recover from whatever fate throws your way.
Our articulated Purpose and strategy, therefore, should be clear and simple, as should our strategic planning process.
Nimbleness is of the essence. We should be able to quickly align and deploy, and just as quickly realign and redeploy.
Modular plans, visual management, stand-up meetings, brevity, a shared simple problem solving method are important elements of agility. (How does all this fit together? My books are essentially movies about it, pardon the plug.)
Corporate planning in many large organizations is, sadly, the opposite of nimble. The following adjectives come to mind: ponderous, heavy, boring, wasteful, difficult, confusing…
By adhering to a heavy, formal annual planning process, we are, in effect, projecting our punches. A droll competitor might wait till we publish our strategy, and then the day after, change theirs…
There is no right answer in strategy, but there is a right process.
Best wishes,
Pascal
Building on my last blog, the strategy is not about perfection. In fact, there is no right strategy.
This is often difficult for senior leaders to accept because it runs contrary to their experience.
Senior leaders are usually the smartest kids in the class, the ones who always have the right answer.
They naturally enjoy the glow of being ‘right’ (synonymous with being ‘smart’). This pattern deepens as they embark on their chosen professions.
Again, they are the smartest people in the room, the ones with the answers, who confidently define what we need to do next.
Such confidence is an important element of leadership. Indeed, good leaders exude a feeling of ‘we will succeed beyond any possibility of doubt.’
Such confidence allows people to relax and get on with the job.
And so, most senior leaders have been conditioned to want to be ‘right’. But, as I said, there is no right strategy.
The past is not the future, and no amount of analysis and reflection will predict the myriad permutations the business chessboard will express.
Some people conclude therefore, that there is no point to developing strategy, that it’s best to ‘just react’ to what happens.
[For strategy geeks, in my opinion, doing so entails misunderstanding the great Henry Mintzberg’s ‘emergent strategy’ concept.]
Yes, it’s true that nowadays it seems there are ‘Black Swans’ everywhere. So why bother with strategy at all?
Twas ever thus – and forever will be. You want to see Black Swans? Check out Ken Burns splendid Vietnam documentary – the episodes that focus on 1968.
There is no right strategy – but there is a right process. By reflecting deeply on what’s happened, on where we want to go, and on what’s preventing us, we better understand the chessboard, the terrain, the pieces, competitors, and our capabilities.
If our strategic planning and deployment process is simple, waste- and hassle-free, we begin the understand the important gaps in technology, customer experience, culture, capability and management systems.
And we take action, we strengthen our weak points, we plug the gaps, we prepare.
In effect, we are projecting our nervous system in to the future, so that when and if the Black Swan appears, we’re not paralyzed. We’re alert, focused and confident. “Folks, this isn’t anything that hasn’t happened before…”
Sound strategic planning, therefore, builds fortitude and tenacity. This is most obvious in sports, where Black Swans are not uncommon. Nobody can predict which way the ball will bounce, or what the score is after the first ten minutes.
But is you have a clear plan and a good understanding of the terrain, competition, your capabilities and have worked on your gaps, you’re much more likely to recover from whatever fate throws your way.
Our articulated Purpose and strategy, therefore, should be clear and simple, as should our strategic planning process.
Nimbleness is of the essence. We should be able to quickly align and deploy, and just as quickly realign and redeploy.
Modular plans, visual management, stand-up meetings, brevity, a shared simple problem solving method are important elements of agility. (How does all this fit together? My books are essentially movies about it, pardon the plug.)
Corporate planning in many large organizations is, sadly, the opposite of nimble. The following adjectives come to mind: ponderous, heavy, boring, wasteful, difficult, confusing…
By adhering to a heavy, formal annual planning process, we are, in effect, projecting our punches. A droll competitor might wait till we publish our strategy, and then the day after, change theirs…
There is no right answer in strategy, but there is a right process.
Best wishes,
Pascal
Labels:
Henry Mintzberg,
Ken Burns,
planning,
Strategy
Monday, October 15, 2012
The Mummy's Curse
By Pascal Dennis
On November 22, 1922, Howard Carter opened King Tutankhamen's tomb -- and triggering various crazes.
For me, the most entertaining was THE MUMMY'S CURSE!!!
(Cue the orchestra)
Various pundits and assorted strays have suggested that Carter unleashed SUPERNATURAL FORCES thereby.
In my (jaundiced) view, something similar happened when academics entered the realm of BUSINESS MANAGEMENT.
After WWII there was an explosion of business schools, and academics, with little practical knowledge of management, broke the seal...
Unnatural (if not supernatural) forces were released thereby.
Most obvious is the absurd spectacle of practicing managers being taught by people who may have never practiced management.
Don't want to be misunderstood.
People go to business school with the best of intentions - to become better managers, to get a better job and so on.
But we often pick up more than we bargained for.
And to be fair, management schools have produced great senseis - Michael Porter, Russell Takeoff, Henry Mintzberg and others come to mind.
But great senseis such as these are noteworthy for being up front about what they don't know.
Takeoff, Mintzberg, the Hopper brothers, and others have written about what I'm calling THE MUMMY'S CURSE.
Mintzberg has suggested, half-seriously, that MBA graduates should have a skull & crossbones tattoo on their foreheads.
(I've been trying to remove mine for some years...)
The Hopper brothers argue, in all seriousness, that America's competitiveness varies inversely with the number or MBAs and lawyers graduating.
I'm having a bit of fun, of course.
But if you're going to business school, or have just graduated, be alert to the risks.
Remember Howard Carter and THE MUMMY'S CURSE!!!
Best,
Pascal
On November 22, 1922, Howard Carter opened King Tutankhamen's tomb -- and triggering various crazes.
For me, the most entertaining was THE MUMMY'S CURSE!!!
(Cue the orchestra)
Various pundits and assorted strays have suggested that Carter unleashed SUPERNATURAL FORCES thereby.
In my (jaundiced) view, something similar happened when academics entered the realm of BUSINESS MANAGEMENT.
After WWII there was an explosion of business schools, and academics, with little practical knowledge of management, broke the seal...
Unnatural (if not supernatural) forces were released thereby.
Most obvious is the absurd spectacle of practicing managers being taught by people who may have never practiced management.
Don't want to be misunderstood.
People go to business school with the best of intentions - to become better managers, to get a better job and so on.
But we often pick up more than we bargained for.
And to be fair, management schools have produced great senseis - Michael Porter, Russell Takeoff, Henry Mintzberg and others come to mind.
But great senseis such as these are noteworthy for being up front about what they don't know.
Takeoff, Mintzberg, the Hopper brothers, and others have written about what I'm calling THE MUMMY'S CURSE.
Mintzberg has suggested, half-seriously, that MBA graduates should have a skull & crossbones tattoo on their foreheads.
(I've been trying to remove mine for some years...)
The Hopper brothers argue, in all seriousness, that America's competitiveness varies inversely with the number or MBAs and lawyers graduating.
I'm having a bit of fun, of course.
But if you're going to business school, or have just graduated, be alert to the risks.
Remember Howard Carter and THE MUMMY'S CURSE!!!
Best,
Pascal
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Why Are Learning Organizations So Scarce?
By Pascal Dennis
A billion dollar question...
There are many root causes, which our blog explores at length.
Here's one of the most important:
Our business & professional schools teach us to think in a way inimical to learning.
Here are some of the mental models I picked up at engineering and business schools:
"I am very smart and successful - and I just received a massive bonus to prove it!"
Effect?
Hubris, disconnection from the front line (where most value is created), apathy & cynicism in the organization.
In other words, an environment that precludes learning.
Don't want to be misunderstood.
People go to professional and business schools with the best of intentions.
To develop their skills, advance their careers and so on.
But we often get more than we bargained for.
The interesting thing is that these mental models are never articulated.
They are in the atmosphere, invisible, accepted and unquestioned.
The great Henry Mintzberg has said that MBA graduates should have a skull & crossbones tattooed to their foreheads.
I've been trying to remove mine for a couple of decades now...
Best,
Pascal
A billion dollar question...
There are many root causes, which our blog explores at length.
Here's one of the most important:
Our business & professional schools teach us to think in a way inimical to learning.
Here are some of the mental models I picked up at engineering and business schools:
- We are very smart and successful
- We can manage from a distance, by the numbers
- Everything wraps up nicely - just like an MBA case study
- Problems are bad things - smart, successful managers like us shouldn't have problems!
- If there is a problem, we need to launch an INITIATIVE - the more complex the better
Corollary: What can front line people possibly teach us?
"I am very smart and successful - and I just received a massive bonus to prove it!"
Effect?
Hubris, disconnection from the front line (where most value is created), apathy & cynicism in the organization.
In other words, an environment that precludes learning.
Don't want to be misunderstood.
People go to professional and business schools with the best of intentions.
To develop their skills, advance their careers and so on.
But we often get more than we bargained for.
The interesting thing is that these mental models are never articulated.
They are in the atmosphere, invisible, accepted and unquestioned.
The great Henry Mintzberg has said that MBA graduates should have a skull & crossbones tattooed to their foreheads.
I've been trying to remove mine for a couple of decades now...
Best,
Pascal
Labels:
business schools,
Henry Mintzberg,
Learning,
Problem Solve
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)